Jump to content


Photo

Full USSR ships tree


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 08:35 AM

For 29 Nov 2012 here it is:

seacraft_en_ShipTree_USSR.jpg



#2 Vipez

Vipez

    Petty Officer First Class

  • Founders
  • 157 posts
  • LocationGermany, Schleswig-Holstein


Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:14 AM

So much to explore and play with :D Good job :yes:


Seal approves :seal:
  • Jeorieemoforo, boursefacilefr, Rogadvave and 9 others like this

seacraft_bigbar_008.png
An alle Deutschen: Schreibt mich ruhig bei Fragen/Problemen an ! Werde euch bestmöglichst helfen :)

In relationship with Zero ( Even if he doesn't want )


#3 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:54 AM

Omgv dont know which way to go

Posted Image


#4 Georgy_Zhukov_1945

Georgy_Zhukov_1945

    Petty Officer Third Class

  • Testers
  • 68 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:33 PM

Why are all Soviet Ships named Project, all of them prototypes?
Posted Image

#5 Titanium Beard

Titanium Beard

    Seaman Apprentice

  • Developers
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:09 PM

That's like they are named in documents

Seal has approved :seal:

#6 DexterCRO

DexterCRO

    Petty Officer Second Class

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 138 posts
  • LocationVarazdin, Croatia

Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:19 PM

A lot of ships in this tree.

What does ASW mean?
Posted Image

#7 Georgy_Zhukov_1945

Georgy_Zhukov_1945

    Petty Officer Third Class

  • Testers
  • 68 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 06:51 PM

ASW-Anti-Submarine Warfare

Edited by Georgy_Zhukov_1945, 30 November 2012 - 06:51 PM.

Posted Image

#8 DexterCRO

DexterCRO

    Petty Officer Second Class

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 138 posts
  • LocationVarazdin, Croatia

Posted 30 November 2012 - 10:30 PM

ASW-Anti-Submarine Warfare


Ugh, this will make my love for subs more difficult.... :blink:
Posted Image

#9 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:59 PM

I'm offic going asw subs will die

Posted Image


#10 HellfishSix

HellfishSix

    Seaman

  • Founders
  • 31 posts

Posted 17 December 2012 - 07:10 PM

Why no project 68bis/Sverdlov-class gun cruisers? Are the Sverdlovs going to be represented by the Project 70 variant?

#11 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 17 December 2012 - 07:44 PM

Why no project 68bis/Sverdlov-class gun cruisers? Are the Sverdlovs going to be represented by the Project 70 variant?


We decide that Project 70 as its modification is better for SC, but Sverdlovs have a chance to be added too.

#12 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 17 December 2012 - 10:19 PM

O.o things are sounding good

Posted Image


#13 Kore666

Kore666

    Recruit

  • Founders
  • 4 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:06 PM

why no Project 941? especially because the US-tech tree incuded the Ohio-Class sub and 941 looks better. Also i think they are a match in armament.

#14 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 11:23 PM

why no Project 941? especially because the US-tech tree incuded the Ohio-Class sub and 941 looks better. Also i think they are a match in armament.


It could be added. I don't remember why we excluded it before (

#15 HellfishSix

HellfishSix

    Seaman

  • Founders
  • 31 posts

Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:09 PM

Why have SSBNs, anyway? Will there be a provision for ICBMs, or will they basically be really big attack subs that can absorb a lot of damage?

#16 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:52 PM

Why have SSBNs, anyway? Will there be a provision for ICBMs, or will they basically be really big attack subs that can absorb a lot of damage?


The second one. We have a desire to add ICBMs, but I don't see it in game for today. So, the SSBNs will be really "fat sausages" that can absorb a lot of damage.

#17 mymarmz

mymarmz

    Recruit

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 01:36 PM

Will they add a typhoon class submarine becouse there should be a russian submarine close to the super typhoon sub called The Red October. thats one of my favorite and biggest russian subs. i listed the picture blow... hopefully XD. :)

Attached Thumbnails

  • CANUN0S8CA9C7V8TCA1JVGDJCA27SA0LCAIO2XGECAS5602YCAV5P3WECA7MOJD4CAX95H1QCAVWQZGWCAZC4PKXCAUG8I0ZCAQFCNQVCAY0264FCA40BG0WCANTFMZZCAB8Z88NCAZKLVL9CASQJ46Z.jpg


#18 Sgt Slimer

Sgt Slimer

    Seaman

  • Founders
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAthens,Greece

Posted 08 April 2013 - 04:05 PM

&^$@&*&^W##%$@&$*
I know from the US Tree which Unit is what ship but from the USSR i have nooooooooooo idea for most of them lol
Cant wait to start and have a look at them lol
And google for every ship they have is not easy or funny too lol
Michael Masiakos
GR

#19 Requiem

Requiem

    Seaman Apprentice

  • Founders
  • 26 posts

Posted 01 June 2013 - 08:21 PM

Kirov as in the battlecrusier, the thing the US brought back the iowas for?!?!?!?!?!

#20 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 02 June 2013 - 04:11 AM

Kirov as in the battlecrusier, the thing the US brought back the iowas for?!?!?!?!?!


Project 1144 (Kirov class) and Project 26 (first ship named Kirov) - are very different ships. We have first one, but the second one is not in our ships tree.

P.S. - Anyway, Iowa has its chances to be added.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users