Jump to content


Photo

Full USA ships tree


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 08:31 AM

For 29 Nov 2012 here it is:

seacraft_en_ShipTree_USA.jpg



#2 Vipez

Vipez

    Petty Officer First Class

  • Founders
  • 157 posts
  • LocationGermany, Schleswig-Holstein


Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:15 AM

Only 4 boats? But so much submarines :cool: Woohooo


Seal approves :seal:
  • Trearereshina, RalUsatsCah, Moreteleveive and 8 others like this

seacraft_bigbar_008.png
An alle Deutschen: Schreibt mich ruhig bei Fragen/Problemen an ! Werde euch bestmöglichst helfen :)

In relationship with Zero ( Even if he doesn't want )


#3 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:55 AM

Seal does indeed approve :seal:

Posted Image


#4 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:13 PM

Only 4 boats? But so much submarines :cool: Woohooo


Submarines play very important role for USA Navy, unlike boats. Seal approves :seal:

#5 DexterCRO

DexterCRO

    Petty Officer Second Class

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 138 posts
  • LocationVarazdin, Croatia

Posted 30 November 2012 - 05:17 PM

Weeee, I already adore this tree! Looove subs!!!

And, of course, Seal approves :seal:
  • tahs542 likes this
Posted Image

#6 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 01 December 2012 - 12:00 AM

Hmm cruisers are the way forward

Posted Image


#7 TheRazorz

TheRazorz

    Recruit

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 02 December 2012 - 01:37 AM

Dont destroyers/cruisers bring more action to the sea? since sub's are under water hunters?i guess they would focus more on supporting? idk..
Posted Image

#8 Corentin196

Corentin196

    Seaman Apprentice

  • Testers
  • 22 posts

Posted 02 December 2012 - 11:26 AM

That looks like an awesome tech tree !
And so many subs ! I like it !
Posted Image

#9 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 02 December 2012 - 06:47 PM

A cruiser will probably be the one that "Takes" Hits, like the equivalent of a Heavy tank, whereas a sub will be more like the "Tank Hunter" of this game. It will be the defensive and the one with the biggest guns, but it can only use it when it knows where its target it.

Posted Image


#10 DEathgod65

DEathgod65

    Recruit

  • Testers
  • 2 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:49 AM

Will the Ticonderoga Class with the Mark 41 Vertical Launch System be included? And also the Independence and Freedom Class littoral combat ships?

#11 BS1945

BS1945

    Seaman

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 09:24 AM

And also the Independence and Freedom Class littoral combat ships?

Initially only Cold War era ships.
Posted Image

#12 gallen89

gallen89

    Recruit

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:13 AM

You may want to consider the inclusion of the Destroyer Escort class ships for the US. They were an important middle ground between the hydrofoil type boats and the bigger frigates. Ships like the Claud Jones class and the Dealey class were commissioned in the late 1950's and served through the mid-1970's, and the lessons learned about anti-submarine warfare are what led to innovations in the Bronstein class and more importantly the Garcia class. They were basically the forebears of the Frigates you have, but significantly smaller (about 700 long tons).

#13 BS1945

BS1945

    Seaman

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 04:35 PM

You may want to consider the inclusion of the Destroyer Escort...

I agree. Dealey seems suitable, but Claud Jones somewhat inappropriate, not being a remarkable vessel.
Posted Image

#14 Misha

Misha

    Seaman

  • Testers
  • 53 posts

Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:26 AM

Hello everyone,

In our History section you may read some informations about in game boats.
Prototype (PT-9)
Plainview (AGEH-1)
Flagstaff (PGH-1)
Pegasus (PHM-1)

#15 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 16 December 2012 - 11:10 AM

Aww... No cruiser info yet :(

Posted Image


#16 HellfishSix

HellfishSix

    Seaman

  • Founders
  • 31 posts

Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:10 PM

This might be an option if you're ever looking for more boats.

http://en.wikipedia....e_class_gunboat

#17 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 17 December 2012 - 10:25 PM

I think they will be always thinking to expand

Posted Image


#18 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 18 December 2012 - 07:54 AM

This might be an option if you're ever looking for more boats.

http://en.wikipedia....e_class_gunboat


It's good idea, thanks!


I think they will be always thinking to expand


Sure :) And as today we limited with 1990th we have twenty two years of weapons evolution to expand :)

#19 Bones2337

Bones2337

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Admirals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
  • LocationEngland

Posted 18 December 2012 - 09:43 AM

Exactly my point and then even experimental prototypes

Posted Image


#20 ufna

ufna

    Humble-bee

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 18 December 2012 - 02:08 PM

Some ships, like a Project 903 (lots of photos you can find on http://ru-aviation.l...om/1347006.html ), are alredy "experimental" :)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users